We have separate job groups for aarch64 - "Fedora AArch64" and "Fedora AArch64 Updates".

I'm not actually sure there's any particularly great reason to do this. It means you have to look in different places for results. If we just got rid of these groups, you'd see the x86_64 and aarch64 results together, like the cloud results [here](https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora&version=44&build=Update-FEDORA-2025-85146d6d20&groupid=2). That seems...kinda better?

The home page would show just two groups, not four. I could look into whether we can tweak it to show more than three builds from each group, in that case.

Asset space is defined per group, so we'd lose the separate settings between x86_64 and aarch64 for that, but - I'm not sure that's actually good? It's probably better to have fewer groups with larger asset size limits for each group anyway.

@pwhalen , you're the one who set things up this way initially (a commit from you created the "Fedora AArch64" group) - do you remember if there was any particular reason why? Were you just copying what we did previously for PowerPC? Can you see a reason not to just merge the groups?

The "Fedora PowerPC" group was the first of these, I guess, in 2017, by Guy from IBM. We don't care a lot about Power lately, though. It's been disabled since the data centre move this summer and nobody's complained.