Uploaded image for project: 'CDI Specification Issues'
  1. CDI Specification Issues
  2. CDI-579

Extension disqualifies a jar as 'implicit bean archive'?

    XMLWordPrintable

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed (View Workflow)
    • Priority: Minor
    • Resolution: Out of Date
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      The bean-discovery-wording is a bit odd.
      This has been in since CDI-1.1

      An archive which:
      • contains a beans.xml file with the bean-discovery-mode of none, or,
      • contains an extension and no beans.xml file is not a bean archive.
      is not a bean archive.
      

      That means even if you have an @ApplicationScoped MyService class in a jar which has a single CDI Extension then this MyServices will not get picked up as CDI bean? At least according to this wording?
      Feels mega-weird to me and might conflict with the implicit beans archive definition a few lines below.

      I'm pretty sure in OWB we will pick those beans up. How does Weld behave?

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

              People

              Assignee:
              Unassigned Unassigned
              Reporter:
              struberg Mark Struberg
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              9 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: